The Psychology of Infidelity: Part 1 – Understanding the Foundations

Introduction: The Sacred and Complex Nature of Intimacy

Sex is life. It pulses through our veins, connects us to others, and serves as one of the most profound forms of communication we can experience as human beings. Beyond the physical act itself, sex represents a symphonic collaboration of every part of the human experience—physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual. When we explore the nature of intimacy and infidelity, we must first acknowledge this fundamental truth: sex is not merely an act but a sacred exchange.

As T.C. Carrier eloquently states in The Secret Science of Black Male & Female Sex, sex represents “a sacred, scientific formula that keeps the universe and everything in it in a delicate and balanced state of harmony.” This perspective invites us to consider sexual relationships not just as personal choices but as energetic exchanges that reverberate through our lives and communities.

Yet despite this sacred nature, our society has developed complex, often contradictory relationships with sexuality. We simultaneously glorify and commodify it while maintaining rigid expectations around monogamy and fidelity. This tension creates the foundation for much of the pain, confusion, and trauma that surrounds infidelity in modern relationships.

The Social Context of Sexuality

To understand infidelity fully, we must first acknowledge that sex is inherently social. Sexual interactions rarely occur in a vacuum but rather within a complex web of socially prescribed standards—both explicit and implicit. These standards determine what we consider appropriate or inappropriate, and they vary dramatically across cultures, periods, and communities.

In Western societies, particularly the United States, we have inherited a complicated relationship with sexuality shaped by historical forces including colonization, enslavement, and religious doctrine. These forces have created contradictory impulses: we valorize individual rights and freedoms while simultaneously enforcing strict expectations around monogamy and sexual exclusivity.

The American emphasis on individual “rights” creates a particular tension in relationships. Many people enter partnerships with an intense sense of possessiveness—not just of their partner’s body but often of their thoughts and desires as well. This sense of ownership stands in stark contrast to the community-centered approaches to partnership found in many other cultural traditions.

As Sobonfu Somé highlights in The Spirit of Intimacy: Ancient African Teachings in the Ways of Relationships, even practices like monogamy and polygamy function differently when embedded within strong community structures. The individualistic approach to relationships that dominates Western thinking creates a particular vulnerability to the devastation of infidelity.

Human Predispositions: Are We Naturally Monogamous?

One of the most persistent questions surrounding human sexuality is whether monogamy represents our natural state or a cultural imposition. Researchers have been divided on this question for centuries. The 19th-century Finnish anthropologist Edward Westermack maintained that monogamy came first and was subsequently included in other marriage systems. By contrast, Lewis Morgan, often considered the father of American anthropology, argued that monogamy represented the pinnacle of human family structures—a view that has since been largely dismissed.

Contemporary social science research offers compelling evidence that monogamy may be more ideal than reality for most human societies. In a survey of 185 human societies conducted by anthropologist C.S. Ford and psychologist Frank Beach, only 29 societies (fewer than 16 percent) formerly restricted their members to monogamy. Even more telling, of these 29 societies, less than one-third utterly disapproved of both premarital and extramarital sex.

The renowned anthropologist G.P. Murdoch found similar patterns in his classic study Social Structure. Examining 238 different human societies around the globe, Murdoch discovered that monogamy was enforced as the only acceptable marriage system in a mere 43 societies. Before contact with Western influences, more than 80 percent of human societies were preferentially polygynous, meaning that male harem-keeping was an aspiration for most men.

However, a preference for polygyny doesn’t mean it was always achieved. Economic realities and power dynamics meant that polygyny was primarily available to high-status males. For the majority, partnerships might be technically monogamous while still allowing for various forms of extramarital relations under specific circumstances.

Polyandry—the practice of a woman having multiple husbands—remains exceedingly rare across human societies. This presents a fascinating biological irony: though men potentially gain more reproductive advantage from multiple partners, women are physiologically capable of engaging in more sexual activity. Yet nearly all social systems are structured to favor male sexual variety.

Even in officially monogamous societies, sexual exclusivity is less universal than we might expect. Approximately 10 percent of avowedly monogamous societies permit relatively free extramarital sexual intercourse. Among the Lepcha of the Himalayas, for example, a husband is expected to object only if his wife has sexual relations with another man in his presence!

About 40 percent of ostensibly monogamous human societies permit extramarital sex under special conditions (such as religious holidays) or with particular individuals. And even among societies with restrictions, these rules typically apply more strictly to wives than to husbands, with only a tiny percentage prohibiting extramarital sexuality for men.

The Monogamy Myth and Its Consequences

Despite this anthropological evidence, most of us in Western societies grow up expecting monogamy to be the natural norm in marriage or committed relationships. This expectation—what author Peggy Vaughn calls “the monogamy myth“—has profound consequences when infidelity occurs.

The monogamy myth is the belief that monogamy is the norm in our society and that social structures universally support it. The effect of believing that most marriages or committed relationships are monogamous is that if an affair happens, it’s seen strictly as a personal failure of the individuals involved rather than a complex social phenomenon.

This personalization leads to intense feelings of blame, shame, wounded pride, and almost universal devastation. Our vocabulary for discussing affairs reinforces this perspective with loaded terms like “cheating,” “unfaithful,” “betrayal,” and “adultery.” These blaming words serve to inflame already raw emotions rather than facilitate understanding.

The ability of people to recover from their experience with infidelity would be significantly improved if they recognized that it’s not just a personal issue but a societal one as well. We can’t fully understand or address affairs without examining the social factors that contribute to them.

How Society Contributes to Affairs

Several societal factors create conditions that make infidelity more likely in our culture:

1. Learning to lie about sex: One of the most fundamental societal factors contributing to affairs is the general dishonesty about sexuality that permeates our culture. From childhood, many of us receive inconsistent, incomplete, or shame-based messages about sex, creating patterns of secrecy and dishonesty that carry into adulthood.

2. “Them” versus “Us”: Another factor is the conditioning we receive from childhood about how to view the opposite sex. By the time we grow up and enter partnerships, we’ve often learned to view members of the opposite sex as fundamentally different or foreign—as “them” rather than “us.” This division makes it difficult to develop proper understanding and empathy.

3. Restrictive role expectations: Society prescribes certain expectations for husband/wife relationships that can feel constraining. The restrictiveness of these marital roles can make people more vulnerable to affairs where they think they can “be themselves” outside these expectations.

4. Sex for sale: The commercialization of sex through advertising and media also contributes to affairs in our society. We are constantly bombarded with sexualized images and messages that shape our expectations and desires.

5. The fairy tale marriage: Another element encouraging affairs is the idealized image of love and marriage that most of us are conditioned to expect. When genuine relationships inevitably fall short of this perfection, some people seek the fantasy elsewhere.

6. Social reinforcement: Ironically, the excitement of discussing the taboo activity of affairs with friends can provide subtle support for infidelity. The reinforcement that comes from sharing such stories can increase positive feelings about having an affair.

7. Media fascination: Whenever infidelity appears in media, it invariably becomes big news, with people eager to learn as many details as possible. This fascination creates a vicarious experience that can normalize or even glamorize affairs.

Conclusion: Setting the Stage for Understanding

As we begin this exploration of infidelity, it’s essential to recognize that our cultural context shapes both how affairs happen and how we respond to them. By examining the historical, anthropological, and sociological factors, we can understand infidelity as a personal betrayal and a complex phenomenon embedded in our social fabric.

In Part 2 of this series, we’ll delve deeper into the historical and psychological impacts of sexual trauma, mainly through the lens of the African diaspora experience, and explore how these historical patterns continue to shape intimate relationships today.

Next Installment: The Psychology of Infidelity: Part 2 – Historical Trauma and Its Sexual Legacy →

Have you experienced infidelity in your relationship? How did societal expectations shape your response? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

FREE SHOCK RACIAL TRAUMA WEBINAR: https://t.ly/3ja4Y

“I just completed a brief session with ChatGPT-Black Trauma. Wow! The responses I got were soooooo helpfu!.” — John Jackson (Patreon Member)

At BlackTraumaGPT.com, we aim to foster healing, understanding, and empowerment within Black communities by providing culturally sensitive education, insights, and mental health resources. We aim to deepen the collective awareness of Black trauma’s historical roots and its contemporary manifestations while guiding individuals and communities toward paths of self-care, resilience, and holistic healing. By leveraging the wisdom of Africana phenomenology and the expertise of Black scholars, we support the transformation of trauma into strength, encouraging collective growth and thriving.

IT’S TIME TO BREAK BLACK TRAUMA! Heal Thyself @ BlackTraumaGPT.com http://blacktraumagpt.com/ ASK THE QUESTION(S)!

———————

Get Social with Doc SHOCK:

SHOCKmetaphysics.com

Healing Racial Black Trauma in the Diaspora from the MAAFA